Photo Credits: The above image is modified from an image generated by DALL-E with prompting to "create a blog post header image about comparing two permitting solutions using data".

Transforming Your City’s Permitting Process: Where to Begin and How to Succeed

Author image
By 
Dheekshita Kumar
|
December 25, 2024
|
Reading Time: 
8 mins

So, you want to make permitting faster in your city! That’s a goal many municipalities share, yet the path to achieving it can be challenging. At CivCheck, we’ve worked with cities across North America who are leading the charge in transforming their permitting processes.

Through these partnerships, we’ve learned that while every city is unique, the starting point for meaningful change is the same: a thorough, unbiased understanding of the problem. In this post, we’ll walk through how to gain that understanding and how to use it to guide effective, data-driven improvements.

Step 1: Understand the Problem

Many cities assume that city operations are the root cause of permitting delays. While there’s usually room for improvement in internal processes, this assumption can result in a biased assessment of the real challenges. 

Instead, we advocate for a compassionate, data-driven approach to identifying the root causes of permitting delays. To begin, conduct a data-driven root cause analysis. This doesn’t have to involve months of consulting work; even a focused, day-long workshop with key stakeholders can yield powerful insights. 

 Key pieces of data to gather include:

  • Permit Backlog: How many permits are currently in the backlog for each review group, including permit intake?
  • Review Timelines: For each review group, how long does it take to complete a review once an application enters the queue? What’s the goal time for reviews?
  • Review Cycles: On average, how many review cycles do applications go through in each review group?
  • Staffing: How many full-time equivalent (FTE) reviewers are available, accounting for those shared across review groups?
  • Common Issues: What are the most frequent issues or comments raised during reviews?

Step 2: Use Data to Diagnose and Plan

Once you’ve collected the data, you can start to diagnose the problem and evaluate potential solutions. Let’s walk through a couple of examples to illustrate how you might evaluate your options.

Example 1: Addressing Review Backlogs

Imagine your city’s "Underwater Castle" review group takes 8 hours to review one permit, has 200 permits in the backlog, and receives six new permits each week. 

Data:

  • Time for 1 Review: 8 hours (1 day) to conduct review
  • Number of Reviewers: 3 reviewers available
  • Backlog: 200 permits to review in backlog
  • Incoming Permit Rate: Add 6 permits/week to backlog

With three reviewers available, we can calculate that 15 permits are completed weekly.

Why? Each reviewer completes 1 review each day. That means, 3 reviews are completed (1 by each plan reviewer) each day. In a 5 day business week, this amounts to 15 reviews completed.

However, 6 new permits are added every week. This means the backlog shrinks by 9 permits per week. At this rate, it will take approximately 20 weeks (5 months) to clear the 200 permit backlog.

Now consider potential solutions:

  1. Reduce Review Times by 50%: By cutting review times to 4 hours, the team can handle 30 reviews per week. With six new permits arriving weekly, the backlog would shrink by 24 permits per week, clearing in about two months.

  2. Hire One Additional Reviewer: Adding a fourth reviewer increases capacity to 20 reviews per week. After accounting for incoming permits, the backlog would shrink by 14 permits weekly, clearing in 3.5 months. However, this assumes the new hire immediately performs at full capacity, which isn’t always realistic due to onboarding time.

Example 2: Evaluating Pre-Screening Solutions

Now let’s suppose you’re evaluating three different pre-screening solutions for applicants:

  1. PDF Checklist: Applicants fill out a checklist outlining the top 10 common issues.
  2. Automated Tool: Applicants upload their plans, and within a minute or two, the tool identifies the top 10 common issues.
  3. Comprehensive Screening Tool: Applicants spend 30-60 minutes going through all possible issues according to the city’s review process.

Scenario 1: All Corrections Are Within the Top 10 Issues

In this scenario, 50% of applications that go through multiple review rounds receive only comments within the top 10 common issues. Here’s how each solution performs:

  • PDF Checklist: Applicants spend 20 minutes and successfully address all potential issues, reducing back-and-forth.
  • Automated Tool: Provides the same results as the checklist in a fraction of the time. This makes it a better option than the checklist.
  • Comprehensive Tool: While more thorough, it adds unnecessary effort for applicants because all corrections are already caught by the simpler solutions.

Scenario 2: Additional Issues Beyond the Top 10

Now suppose every application in the 50% group has at least one additional issue that isn’t within the top 10 common issues. Here’s how each solution fares:

  • PDF Checklist and Automated Tool: Both reduce some corrections but still result in back-and-forth for the unresolved issues. The permitting process remains inefficient for these applications.
  • Comprehensive Tool: Identifies all possible issues, eliminating back-and-forth entirely. In this scenario, it becomes the only solution capable of fully solving the problem.
Additional Considerations: Time Savings for Reviewers

Applications with fewer corrections might take less time to review. To evaluate the overall impact, you would need data on:

  • Average review time for applications with varying levels of corrections.
  • Whether reduced corrections lead to meaningful time savings for reviewers.

Step 3: Implement Targeted Solutions

With these examples in mind, it’s clear that no single solution fits every situation. Depending on the specific challenges your city faces, you may need a combination of process improvements, new tools, or additional resources to make permitting faster and more streamlined. 

How CivCheck Can Help

This is where CivCheck comes in. We specialize in helping cities streamline their permitting processes with a mix of advanced technology and a human-centric approach. 

Our Guided AI Plan Review platform:

  • Reduces Review Times: Our automation tools speed up reviews by pre-screening applications for completeness and compliance, flagging potential issues before they even reach a reviewer.
  • Minimizes Application Errors: By helping applicants identify and resolve issues early, our system reduces the back-and-forth between applicants and reviewers, ensuring faster permit approvals.
  • Supports Reviewer Training: For new reviewers, our platform serves as an effective training tool, offering structured guidance on commonly misunderstood regulations and best practices.

Every city’s permitting process is unique, and it’s understandable to feel unsure about the right first steps. With a measured, data-driven approach—and the right tools—meaningful change is possible. 

At CivCheck, we don’t just hand you a product; we help you understand your unique situation and identify the best solutions for your city, from reducing review times to training new staff and minimizing errors. If you’re ready to see how our platform can support your goals, schedule a demo today and let’s explore a practical path forward together!

Download the full version in PDF format today.

CivCheck checkmark logo
Thank you! You should receive the PDF in your email inbox shortly.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.